Illegal Mexican Immigration Invasion Aztlan Narco Terrorism

1) Aztlan Militants are now shooting for Article X of the Treaty of Hidalgo Guadalupe. Under Article X, Mexico demands that it's citizens with land grants/titles or deeds will not be thrown off their land. However, it does not mean Mexico will have a claim to said lands. Only those Mexicans who stayed on their land would have a claim for which they have a grant/title or deed. Article X was expunged by the USA, or so claims Mexico. Regardless, it still does not give Mexico any rights to anything at all.

2) Their latest ‘political’ lunacy is declaring themselves “Native American Indians” and claiming all the rights associated with that title. If we follow that line of thought then the Mex will kick the Shoshone, Cheyenne, Apache, Ute, and whomever off the land too. If in fact it belonged to any migratory “Indians” to begin with, as they were hunter gatherers and, necessarily, kicked someone else off the land when they came through -- while heading somewhere else. Regardless, any land on which a Mexican steps foot - despite how fleeting or migratory it may be at any point in history - they NOW claim as their “Native American Indian” homeland(s).

3) Despite the fact that Mexico 'Lost' in a War the land they now claim as theirs, it is legitimate, tax paying American citizens that feed and otherwise support their hapless descendants.

4) Much of America from Oregon to Texas, that they now claim as theirs, was some 95% unoccupied at the time of that War; specifically the south west. It was then successfully pioneered and developed by European Protestant Americans, NOT by 'Mexicans' or anyone else.

5) The 'Mexican' claims over California as part of the so-called “Nation of Aztlan” territorial claim are hideously bogus. Spain ruled over California from mid-1500s, or 300 years before the territory that came to be known as the 'Republic of Mexico' gained its independence from Spain in 1821. Prior to 1821 the term Mexico applied only to Mexico City and not to a country or any specific people, and did not apply to diverse and dissimilar peoples living North or South of the Rio Grande prior to European colonization.
       Pre-Columbians were not a homogeneous people. In addition, neither the Spanish language nor “Mexican culture” is native to pre-Columbian people and therefore it is a false and invalid rallying point for a territorial claim based on the rights of a disconnected diversity of non-Hispanic ethnic and linguistic pre-Columbians. It is a counterfeit scam handled by anti-American communist factions.

6) Simply put: 'Mexico' cannot claim that Spain’s jurisdiction over the territory that it ruled for hundreds of years as a colonial power is “invalid” and, at the same time, claim that 'Mexico' has valid claim to the same territory(ies) based on having secured independence from Spain. This is obvious: If Spain had no valid jurisdiction over California (as they allege to support in their bogus arguments), then by consequence neither does so-called Mexico.
     They cannot have it both ways, and despite that, their own arguments validate Mexico losing part of the so-called "Nation of Aztlan" in a War with the United States! If that is false and never happened, then the land that they now claim belongs to them, would in fact still belong to Spain. With such convoluted and self-contradictory thinking, no wonder their multi-cultural, self-contradictory "La Raza Unita" (The Race United) is such a disaster.
      Even a glancing look at history will also show that virtually all cultural and economic advancement within 'Mexico' came to an abrupt halt when the European Spaniards pulled out ("Spanish" and "Mexican" are not interchangeable words defining race or culture. Spaniards are White Europeans, Mexicans are a multi-ethnic conglomeration).
      Left to their own means in the United States, multi-ethnic multi-cultural 'Mexicans' naturally reverted back to what they were and always have been -- a violent 'culture' of diverse ethnicity waging tribal warfare as witnessed in any inner city today.

See Idaho article - 'Coming Soon to your Neighborhood

7) The simple and obvious fact is that subversive militant Mexicans demand from Americans what they are incapable of building themselves, let alone sustain or progress. That is irrefutable or they would not be coming here by the multiple millions in the first place. Americans would instead be going to Mexico, a land abundantly rich in natural resources and diverse geography. A land of many opportunities squandered by the very people illegally entering the U.S. where they quickly destroy culturally and economically sound American communities and transform them into 'spreading mexican failures' while American tax payers pay the bill...